1969 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 1997 MCC Smart is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,950 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Chevrolet Camaro | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chevrolet | MCC |
| Model | Camaro | Smart |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4950 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 53 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1460 mm |
