1969 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 1998 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 1998 Mazda Laputa is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,950 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1998 Mazda Laputa is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Mazda Laputa will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Chevrolet Camaro | 1998 Mazda Laputa | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
| Model | Camaro | Laputa |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1998 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4950 cc | 658 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 57 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1540 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |
