1969 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2000 Mazda AZ
To start off, 2000 Mazda AZ is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,068 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2000 Mazda AZ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Mazda AZ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Camaro | 2000 Mazda AZ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Camaro | AZ |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Body Type | Coupe | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5068 cc | 656 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2370 mm |