1969 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2003 Chevrolet SSR
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet SSR is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,316 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet SSR is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Camaro | 2003 Chevrolet SSR | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Camaro | SSR |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4950 cc | 5316 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 296 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4870 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2000 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2950 mm |