1969 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2004 Toyota Mark II
To start off, 2004 Toyota Mark II is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 5,068 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2004 Toyota Mark II is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Mark II will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Chevrolet Camaro | 2004 Toyota Mark II | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Camaro | Mark II |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5068 cc | 1988 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 156 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 4740 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2600 mm |
