1969 Chevrolet Camaro vs. 2005 Ford Econoline
To start off, 2005 Ford Econoline is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 4,950 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Camaro | 2005 Ford Econoline | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Camaro | Econoline |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Body Type | Coupe | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4950 cc | 4195 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4700 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 3510 mm |