1969 Chevrolet Impala vs. 1985 Fiat Ritmo

To start off, 1985 Fiat Ritmo is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Chevrolet Impala (166 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. (53 HP @ 5600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Chevrolet Impala should accelerate faster than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 1055 kg more than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1985 Fiat Ritmo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Chevrolet Impala (387 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 301 more torque (in Nm) than 1985 Fiat Ritmo. (86 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1969 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1985 Fiat Ritmo.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Chevrolet Impala 1985 Fiat Ritmo
Make Chevrolet Fiat
Model Impala Ritmo
Year Released 1969 1985
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 5733 cc 1116 cc
Engine Cylinders 8 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 166 HP 53 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 387 Nm 86 Nm
Torque RPM 2400 RPM 2900 RPM
Engine Bore Size 101.6 mm 70 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88.4 mm 72 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 11.0:1 9.6:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1895 kg 840 kg
Vehicle Length 5600 mm 4020 mm
Vehicle Width 2030 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1370 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 3100 mm 2460 mm