1969 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2000 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 6,554 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 788 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Astro.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Astro is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Astro will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Astro has automatic transmission and 1969 Chevrolet Impala has manual transmission. 1969 Chevrolet Impala will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Astro will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Impala | 2000 Chevrolet Astro | |
Make | Chevrolet | Chevrolet |
Model | Impala | Astro |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6554 cc | 4300 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1975 kg | 1187 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 53 L | 64 L |