1969 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2003 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2003 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 7,442 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 105 kg more than 2003 Toyota 4Runner.
Because 2003 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Toyota 4Runner has automatic transmission and 1969 Chevrolet Impala has manual transmission. 1969 Chevrolet Impala will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Toyota 4Runner will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Impala | 2003 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
Model | Impala | 4Runner |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7442 cc | 4662 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 232 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2065 kg | 1960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2800 mm |