1969 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2006 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2006 Holden Commodore is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 5,976 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Holden Commodore is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Holden Commodore (360 HP) has 194 more horse power than 1969 Chevrolet Impala. (166 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1969 Chevrolet Impala.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Chevrolet Impala (387 Nm) has 97 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Holden Commodore. (290 Nm). This means 1969 Chevrolet Impala will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Holden Commodore.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Impala | 2006 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Impala | Commodore |
Year Released | 1969 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5733 cc | 5976 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 166 HP | 360 HP |
Torque | 387 Nm | 290 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |