1969 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2009 Mazda BT-50
To start off, 2009 Mazda BT-50 is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 7,442 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 940 kg more than 2009 Mazda BT-50.
Because 2009 Mazda BT-50 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Mazda BT-50 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Impala | 2009 Mazda BT-50 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Mazda |
Model | Impala | BT-50 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7442 cc | 2604 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2065 kg | 1125 kg |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 64 L |