1969 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2012 Ford F-250
To start off, 2012 Ford F-250 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 7,442 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2012 Ford F-250 has automatic transmission and 1969 Chevrolet Impala has manual transmission. 1969 Chevrolet Impala will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2012 Ford F-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Impala | 2012 Ford F-250 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Impala | F-250 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7442 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 385 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed shiftable automatic |
Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 6269 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 2029 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1966 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 3967 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 132 L |