1969 Chevrolet Impala vs. 2013 Honda CR-Z
To start off, 2013 Honda CR-Z is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Impala. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Impala would be higher. At 7,442 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Impala is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Impala weights approximately 869 kg more than 2013 Honda CR-Z.
Because 1969 Chevrolet Impala is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Chevrolet Impala. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Honda CR-Z, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Chevrolet Impala | 2013 Honda CR-Z | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Honda |
| Model | Impala | CR-Z |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7442 cc | 1497 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2065 kg | 1196 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5600 mm | 4079 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1394 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3100 mm | 2435 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 40 L |
