1969 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2000 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2000 Toyota Tundra is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 4,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 670 kg more than 1969 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 2000 Toyota Tundra is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Toyota Tundra will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Chevrolet Nova | 2000 Toyota Tundra | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Nova | Tundra |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 4663 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 242 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 5530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1920 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1800 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 3270 mm |
