1969 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2002 Holden Astra
To start off, 2002 Holden Astra is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Chevrolet Nova weights approximately 130 kg more than 2002 Holden Astra.
Because 1969 Chevrolet Nova is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Chevrolet Nova. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Holden Astra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Nova | 2002 Holden Astra | |
Make | Chevrolet | Holden |
Model | Nova | Astra |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2507 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 120 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1150 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |