1969 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 2,926 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1160 kg more than 1969 Chevrolet Nova.
Because 2002 Land Rover Range Rover is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Land Rover Range Rover will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Chevrolet Nova | 2002 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Land Rover |
| Model | Nova | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2926 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 175 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2440 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4820 mm | 4960 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 2200 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2800 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 100 L |
