1969 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace
To start off, 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 2,507 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Nova is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace weights approximately 250 kg more than 1969 Chevrolet Nova.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Chevrolet Nova | 2004 Toyota Hi-Ace | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Nova | Hi-Ace |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2507 cc | 2237 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 101 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 16 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1530 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2500 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 76 L | 70 L |
