1969 Chevrolet Nova vs. 2011 Cadillac Escalade

To start off, 2011 Cadillac Escalade is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Nova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Nova would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Cadillac Escalade is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Cadillac Escalade weights approximately 1339 kg more than 1969 Chevrolet Nova.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Chevrolet Nova 2011 Cadillac Escalade
Make Chevrolet Cadillac
Model Nova Escalade
Year Released 1969 2011
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2507 cc 6200 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 0 HP 403 HP
Fuel Type Gasoline Flex Fuel
Drive Type Rear Rear
Number of Seats 4 seats 7 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 2619 kg
Vehicle Length 4820 mm 5662 mm
Vehicle Width 1850 mm 2009 mm
Vehicle Height 1380 mm 1857 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 3302 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 76 L 117 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]