1969 Chevrolet Vega vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2005 Renault Clio is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Chevrolet Vega. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Chevrolet Vega would be higher. At 2,287 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Chevrolet Vega is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Chevrolet Vega (90 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2005 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Chevrolet Vega should accelerate faster than 2005 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 75 kg more than 1969 Chevrolet Vega.
Because 1969 Chevrolet Vega is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Chevrolet Vega. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Chevrolet Vega (164 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 59 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1969 Chevrolet Vega will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio. 1969 Chevrolet Vega has automatic transmission and 2005 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2005 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1969 Chevrolet Vega will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Chevrolet Vega | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Chevrolet | Renault |
Model | Vega | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2287 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 164 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 89 mm | 69.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 91.9 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 8.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1005 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4320 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2480 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 42 L | 55 L |