1969 Citroen 2CV vs. 1996 Volvo 460
To start off, 1996 Volvo 460 is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 1,596 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Volvo 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Volvo 460 (82 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1969 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Volvo 460 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1996 Volvo 460 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1969 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen 2CV | 1996 Volvo 460 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | 460 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1025 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4410 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |