1969 Citroen 2CV vs. 2000 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2000 Ford Mustang is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford Mustang (190 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1969 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Mustang weights approximately 830 kg more than 1969 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen 2CV | 2000 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | 2CV | Mustang |
Year Released | 1969 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 3791 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | V |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1390 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4660 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 59 L |