1969 Citroen 2CV vs. 2002 Volvo S60
To start off, 2002 Volvo S60 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,435 cc (5 cylinders), 2002 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Volvo S60 (295 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 277 more horse power than 1969 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Volvo S60 weights approximately 1011 kg more than 1969 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen 2CV | 2002 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | 2CV | S60 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 2435 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 295 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1571 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4610 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 70 L |