1969 Citroen 2CV vs. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 4,396 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Land Rover Range Rover is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover (282 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 264 more horse power than 1969 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 1955 kg more than 1969 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen 2CV | 2003 Land Rover Range Rover | |
Make | Citroen | Land Rover |
Model | 2CV | Range Rover |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 4396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Horse Power | 18 HP | 282 HP |
Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 2515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 2200 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 100 L |