1969 Citroen 2CV vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen 2CV. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen 2CV would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (209 HP @ 1500 RPM) has 191 more horse power than 1969 Citroen 2CV. (18 HP @ 3500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen 2CV. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 980 kg more than 1969 Citroen 2CV. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Citroen 2CV | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | 2CV | S60 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 425 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
| Horse Power | 18 HP | 209 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3500 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3790 mm | 4580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2770 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |
