1969 Citroen Ak 350 vs. 1995 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1995 Ford Mustang is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen Ak 350. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen Ak 350 would be higher. At 4,947 cc (8 cylinders), 1995 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1995 Ford Mustang weights approximately 878 kg more than 1969 Citroen Ak 350.
Because 1995 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1995 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Citroen Ak 350, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Ford Mustang (386 Nm) has 345 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Citroen Ak 350. (41 Nm). This means 1995 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Citroen Ak 350.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen Ak 350 | 1995 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Ak 350 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1969 | 1995 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 4947 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 22 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 41 Nm | 386 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 605 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3610 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1710 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2580 mm |