1969 Citroen Ami vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1981 Zastava 102 is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,115 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Zastava 102 (53 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1969 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Zastava 102 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Zastava 102 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1969 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (78 Nm) has 36 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Citroen Ami. (42 Nm). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen Ami | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | Ami | 102 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 1115 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 42 Nm | 78 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2160 mm |