1969 Citroen Ami vs. 2008 Renault Clio
To start off, 2008 Renault Clio is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 1,149 cc, 2008 Renault Clio is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Renault Clio weights approximately 215 kg more than 1969 Citroen Ami.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2008 Renault Clio (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Citroen Ami. (70 Nm @ 2745 RPM). This means 2008 Renault Clio will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Citroen Ami.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen Ami | 2008 Renault Clio | |
Make | Citroen | Renault |
Model | Ami | Clio |
Year Released | 1969 | 2008 |
Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 994 cc | 1149 cc |
Horse Power | 48 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 70 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2745 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 770 kg | 985 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 50 L |