1969 Citroen Ami vs. 2010 Volvo S40
To start off, 2010 Volvo S40 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen Ami. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen Ami would be higher. At 2,400 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo S40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo S40 (168 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 133 more horse power than 1969 Citroen Ami. (35 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo S40 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen Ami. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo S40 weights approximately 849 kg more than 1969 Citroen Ami. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen Ami | 2010 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | Ami | S40 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Body Type | Station Wagon | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 602 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | boxer | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 35 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 620 kg | 1469 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 4475 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1530 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 60 L |