1969 Citroen DS vs. 2004 Dodge Durango
To start off, 2004 Dodge Durango is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen DS would be higher. At 3,704 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Dodge Durango is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Dodge Durango (210 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 128 more horse power than 1969 Citroen DS. (82 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Dodge Durango should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Dodge Durango weights approximately 839 kg more than 1969 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Dodge Durango is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Dodge Durango. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Citroen DS, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen DS | 2004 Dodge Durango | |
Make | Citroen | Dodge |
Model | DS | Durango |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 3704 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 82 HP | 210 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 2119 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1480 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 3040 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 25 L | 102 L |