1969 Citroen DS vs. 2005 Volvo S60
To start off, 2005 Volvo S60 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,401 cc (5 cylinders), 2005 Volvo S60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Volvo S60 (209 HP @ 1500 RPM) has 94 more horse power than 1969 Citroen DS. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Volvo S60 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Volvo S60 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1969 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen DS | 2005 Volvo S60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | DS | S60 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2175 cc | 2401 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 209 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 1500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4580 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2770 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 68 L |