1969 Citroen DS vs. 2010 Cadillac BLS
To start off, 2010 Cadillac BLS is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen DS. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen DS would be higher. At 2,792 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Cadillac BLS is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Cadillac BLS (252 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 137 more horse power than 1969 Citroen DS. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Cadillac BLS should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen DS. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Cadillac BLS weights approximately 185 kg more than 1969 Citroen DS. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen DS | 2010 Cadillac BLS | |
Make | Citroen | Cadillac |
Model | DS | BLS |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2175 cc | 2792 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1450 kg | 1635 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5000 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3140 mm | 2680 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.9 L/100km | 10.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 58 L |