1969 Citroen Dyane 4 vs. 1977 Volvo 66

To start off, 1977 Volvo 66 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen Dyane 4 would be higher. At 1,289 cc (4 cylinders), 1977 Volvo 66 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1977 Volvo 66 (56 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1977 Volvo 66 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4.

Because 1977 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1969 Citroen Dyane 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1977 Volvo 66 (94 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. (29 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1977 Volvo 66 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Citroen Dyane 4 1977 Volvo 66
Make Citroen Volvo
Model Dyane 4 66
Year Released 1969 1977
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 425 cc 1289 cc
Engine Cylinders 2 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 24 HP 56 HP
Engine RPM 6750 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 29 Nm 94 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 68.5 mm 73.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 59 mm 77 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.8:1 8.5:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 3880 mm 3910 mm
Vehicle Width 1510 mm 1550 mm