1969 Citroen Dyane 4 vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Citroen Dyane 4 would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 201 more horse power than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. (24 HP @ 6750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1776 kg more than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 360 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4. (29 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Citroen Dyane 4.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Citroen Dyane 4 | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Dyane 4 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 425 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 24 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 29 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 68.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 59 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 594 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3880 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1510 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1560 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 43 L | 132 L |