1969 DAF 44 vs. 1963 Holden EJ
To start off, 1969 DAF 44 is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Holden EJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Holden EJ would be higher. At 2,262 cc (6 cylinders), 1963 Holden EJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1963 Holden EJ (64 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1969 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1963 Holden EJ should accelerate faster than 1969 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Holden EJ weights approximately 379 kg more than 1969 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1963 Holden EJ (163 Nm @ 1400 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1963 Holden EJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 DAF 44 | 1963 Holden EJ | |
| Make | DAF | Holden |
| Model | 44 | EJ |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 842 cc | 2262 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 64 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 65 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 1400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1134 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2680 mm |
