1969 DAF 44 vs. 1978 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1978 Mazda Cosmo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,769 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1969 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1978 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1969 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda Cosmo weights approximately 337 kg more than 1969 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1978 Mazda Cosmo (150 Nm @ 3300 RPM) has 85 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 1978 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 DAF 44 | 1978 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | DAF | Mazda |
| Model | 44 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1978 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 842 cc | 1769 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 34 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 65 Nm | 150 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 1092 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4480 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2520 mm |
