1969 DAF 44 vs. 2010 Mazda 2
To start off, 2010 Mazda 2 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 DAF 44. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 DAF 44 would be higher. At 1,498 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Mazda 2 (102 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 1969 DAF 44. (34 HP @ 4500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 2 should accelerate faster than 1969 DAF 44. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Mazda 2 weights approximately 205 kg more than 1969 DAF 44. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Mazda 2 (136 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 71 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 DAF 44. (65 Nm @ 2200 RPM). This means 2010 Mazda 2 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 DAF 44.
Compare all specifications:
1969 DAF 44 | 2010 Mazda 2 | |
Make | DAF | Mazda |
Model | 44 | 2 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 842 cc | 1498 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 2 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 34 HP | 102 HP |
Engine RPM | 4500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 65 Nm | 136 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 755 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1550 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2260 mm | 2500 mm |