1969 Daihatsu Consorte vs. 1980 Mercury Lynx

To start off, 1980 Mercury Lynx is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Daihatsu Consorte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Daihatsu Consorte would be higher. At 1,597 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mercury Lynx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mercury Lynx (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1969 Daihatsu Consorte. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Lynx should accelerate faster than 1969 Daihatsu Consorte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mercury Lynx weights approximately 265 kg more than 1969 Daihatsu Consorte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Daihatsu Consorte is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Daihatsu Consorte. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1980 Mercury Lynx, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mercury Lynx (121 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 28 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Daihatsu Consorte. (93 Nm @ 3800 RPM). This means 1980 Mercury Lynx will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Daihatsu Consorte.

Compare all specifications:

1969 Daihatsu Consorte 1980 Mercury Lynx
Make Daihatsu Mercury
Model Consorte Lynx
Year Released 1969 1980
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1164 cc 1597 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 67 HP 70 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4600 RPM
Torque 93 Nm 121 Nm
Torque RPM 3800 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 75 mm 80 mm
Engine Stroke Size 66 mm 79.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 8.8:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Vehicle Weight 685 kg 950 kg
Vehicle Length 3650 mm 4170 mm
Vehicle Width 1460 mm 1680 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1360 mm
Wheelbase Size 2170 mm 2400 mm