1969 Datsun 1600 vs. 2004 Toyota Corolla
To start off, 2004 Toyota Corolla is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Datsun 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Datsun 1600 would be higher. At 1,803 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Toyota Corolla is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Datsun 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Datsun 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Toyota Corolla, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Datsun 1600 | 2004 Toyota Corolla | |
| Make | Datsun | Toyota |
| Model | 1600 | Corolla |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1803 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 130 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.8 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 7.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 6.9 L/100km |
