1969 Datsun 1600 vs. 2009 Suzuki Swift
To start off, 2009 Suzuki Swift is newer by 40 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Datsun 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Datsun 1600 would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 1969 Datsun 1600 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Suzuki Swift is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 Datsun 1600. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Suzuki Swift will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Suzuki Swift has automatic transmission and 1969 Datsun 1600 has manual transmission. 1969 Datsun 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Suzuki Swift will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Datsun 1600 | 2009 Suzuki Swift | |
| Make | Datsun | Suzuki |
| Model | 1600 | Swift |
| Year Released | 1969 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1600 cc | 1490 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 100 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.7 L/100km | 6.7 L/100km |
