1969 Datsun 1600 vs. 2010 Mazda 6
To start off, 2010 Mazda 6 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Datsun 1600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Datsun 1600 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Mazda 6 is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1969 Datsun 1600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Datsun 1600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Mazda 6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2010 Mazda 6 has automatic transmission and 1969 Datsun 1600 has manual transmission. 1969 Datsun 1600 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2010 Mazda 6 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Datsun 1600 | 2010 Mazda 6 | |
Make | Datsun | Mazda |
Model | 1600 | 6 |
Year Released | 1969 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1600 cc | 3700 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 272 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption | 7.8 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 11.8 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |