1969 De Tomaso Mangusta vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta would be higher. At 4,727 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta (301 HP) has 158 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (143 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2003 Ford Ecosport has automatic transmission and 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta has manual transmission. 1969 De Tomaso Mangusta will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 Ford Ecosport will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1969 De Tomaso Mangusta | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | De Tomaso | Ford |
Model | Mangusta | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1969 | 2003 |
Body Type | Coupe | SUV |
Engine Position | Middle | Front |
Engine Size | 4727 cc | 2000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 301 HP | 143 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1840 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1110 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2490 mm |