1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1952 Jaguar XK
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Jaguar XK. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Jaguar XK would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1952 Jaguar XK | |
Make | Dodge | Jaguar |
Model | Challenger | XK |
Year Released | 1969 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1993 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2600 mm |