1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1954 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. (225 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 22 kg more than 1954 Ford Thunderbird. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1954 Ford Thunderbird | |
| Make | Dodge | Ford |
| Model | Challenger | Thunderbird |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1954 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 7206 cc | 5114 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 317 HP | 225 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 8.8:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1578 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1790 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2600 mm |
