1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 475 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1963 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Challenger | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 6229 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 2100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 5380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3130 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 81 L |