1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1963 TVR Griffith
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 TVR Griffith. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 TVR Griffith would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 710 kg more than 1963 TVR Griffith.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1963 TVR Griffith | |
Make | Dodge | TVR |
Model | Challenger | Griffith |
Year Released | 1969 | 1963 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 4727 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 3560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2170 mm |