1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1967 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1969 Dodge Challenger is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 6,286 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (200 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1967 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1967 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 396 kg more than 1967 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (422 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 264 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1967 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Dodge | Triumph |
Model | Challenger | 2000 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6286 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 200 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 422 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1566 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 64 L |