1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1970 ZIL 114
To start off, 1970 ZIL 114 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 7,206 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (317 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 63 more horse power than 1970 ZIL 114. (254 HP @ 4400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1970 ZIL 114. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1970 ZIL 114 weights approximately 1575 kg more than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 ZIL 114 (580 Nm @ 2900 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Dodge Challenger. (545 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1970 ZIL 114 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Dodge Challenger.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1970 ZIL 114 | |
Make | Dodge | ZIL |
Model | Challenger | 114 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7206 cc | 6998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 317 HP | 254 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 545 Nm | 580 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 3175 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 6300 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2080 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 3770 mm |