1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1971 NSU Ro 80
To start off, 1971 NSU Ro 80 is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 5,208 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (156 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (115 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1971 NSU Ro 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 285 kg more than 1971 NSU Ro 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1971 NSU Ro 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (352 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 164 more torque (in Nm) than 1971 NSU Ro 80. (188 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1971 NSU Ro 80.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1971 NSU Ro 80 | |
Make | Dodge | NSU |
Model | Challenger | Ro 80 |
Year Released | 1969 | 1971 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5208 cc | 1990 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 156 HP | 115 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 352 Nm | 188 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1495 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2870 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 82 L |