1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1973 Triumph 2000
To start off, 1973 Triumph 2000 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 3,687 cc (6 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Dodge Challenger (123 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1973 Triumph 2000. (83 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1969 Dodge Challenger should accelerate faster than 1973 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 222 kg more than 1973 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1969 Dodge Challenger (233 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 98 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Triumph 2000. (135 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 1969 Dodge Challenger will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1969 Dodge Challenger | 1973 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Challenger | 2000 |
| Year Released | 1969 | 1973 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3687 cc | 1998 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 123 HP | 83 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
| Torque | 233 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2400 RPM | 2900 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1470 kg | 1248 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1700 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2700 mm |
