1969 Dodge Challenger vs. 1976 Renault Rodeo
To start off, 1976 Renault Rodeo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Dodge Challenger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Dodge Challenger would be higher. At 6,974 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Dodge Challenger is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Dodge Challenger weights approximately 945 kg more than 1976 Renault Rodeo.
Because 1969 Dodge Challenger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Dodge Challenger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1976 Renault Rodeo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1969 Dodge Challenger | 1976 Renault Rodeo | |
Make | Dodge | Renault |
Model | Challenger | Rodeo |
Year Released | 1969 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6974 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 351 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1625 kg | 680 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4870 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1290 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2800 mm | 2410 mm |